To assess the first three hypotheses, Pearson’s correlations were used with partial correlations used to account for the effect of state anxiety (state score from the STAI . Tests of normality showed that all variables were normally distributed and hence suitable for this parametric test, except for the following: fixation count to head and body, dwell time to the head and background and time to first fixate the body. For correlations where one variable was not normally distributed both Pearson’s (r) and Spearman’s (rs) analyses Sikh dating service were conducted and reported. Partial correlations are based on Pearson’s correlation regardless of distribution. All tests are two-tailed.
Overall performance
Just after pre-processing got occurred, the attention movement study is actually featured to own outliers (analysis factors larger than step one.five times the interquartile variety getting certain adjustable), from the investigating boxplots. The fresh rural research factors (n = 19) was basically excluded having private analysis facts in vision-record actions , comprising cuatro.22% of your overall data.
Hypervigilance
No significant correlation was found between LSAS scores and time to first fixate the head r (16) = .101, p = .709 and the body r (21) = -.062, p = .790, (r s (21) = -.144, p = .522). This remained the case when controlling for state anxiety using a partial correlation, r (13) = .088, p = .754, and the body r (18) = -.070, p = .7710
502, p = .034 (Fig 2) (disregarding county stress) and you will r (15) = -.499, p = .041 (controlling for state stress).
There is zero high relationship ranging from LSAS score and you will basic obsession years to your body, roentgen (23) = -.141, p = .521 which was also the instance whenever managing having county anxiety using a limited correlation roentgen (20) = -.133, p =. 556
Cures
There were no significant relationships between LSAS scores and dwell time to the head r (28) = -.073, p = .714 (rs (28) = -.132, p = .502) the body r (30) = -.090, p = .637, and the background r (30) = -.231, p = .220 (rs (30) = -.254, p = .175).
Limited correlations and revealed that when managing having condition stress, you will find zero tall relationship between your LSAS ratings and you can live time for you your mind roentgen (25) = -.063, p = .756, one’s body roentgen (27) = -.090, p = .643, additionally the records roentgen (27) = -.231, p = .229.
There was no significant relationship between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (28) = .049, p = .805 (rs (28) = -.055, p = .782), the body r (29) = -.075, p = .700 (rs (21) = -.033, p = .865) and the background r (29) = -.258, p = .176. Partial correlations also showed that when controlling for state anxiety, there were still no significant relationships between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (25) = .068, p = .743, the body r (26) = -.075, p = .704, and the background r (28) = -.258, p = .185
Hyperscanning
An effective inverse relationship are discover between scanpath duration and you can LSAS rating, roentgen (28) = -.483, p = .008 whenever overlooking state stress, and you will stayed whenever condition stress are regulated having r (26) = -.498, p = .007 (Fig 3).
A powerful negative dating is found ranging from total saccade count and LSAS score, roentgen (29) = -.511, p = .005 when overlooking state anxiety, and this remained extreme an once condition anxiety was regulated to possess r (26) = -.516, p = .005. Zero matchmaking was found anywhere between indicate saccade amplitude and you can LSAS score yet not, roentgen (29) = -.176, p = .362 even in the event condition nervousness was controlled having roentgen (26) = -.160, p = .417
댓글을 남겨주세요