John is additionally rumored becoming associated with Abraham Lincoln in some way through certainly Lincoln’s Grandmas

It appears to be Anna is actually the newest youngest out of her sisters – Anna was just 5 whenever her mommy died and you will 17 whenever their father died.

JOHN

Moms and dads John Porter out of Tapenhall (1560-1625); kid out-of Thomas Porter Anne-marie CALVERT Sybil VESSEY (1561-1625); girl out-of Thomas Vessey Elizabeth Chapel

John Porter’s range try rumored to visit all the way upwards to the Norman Knight, William de la Grande just who fought alongside William the new Conqueror from inside the 1066, at the Battle off Hastings.

  • Francis Porter (1585-1635); Spouses: Joan DRAPER, Joan SMITH
  • Margaret PORTER Nash (1587-1628); Spouse: ______ Nash
  • Frances PORTER (1588-1635); Spouse: John Draper
  • Thomas Porter II (1590-1638) – they are good II? That We?
  • William Porter (1596-1635)
  • Elegance Ann PORTER (abt 1598-1659); Spouse: William Judson Jr
  • Flower PORTER (1598-1635); Spouse: ___ Wentworth
  • John Porter (out-of Narragansett) (1605-1674); < . – Look for below “Not our Colonial Child”

Hmm. Performed they actually possess a masculine Francis and you will a female Frances who one another parece is actually comparable (Joan – John)? Complete stranger things have happened, but this will make myself ponder and requires browse.

In which in the world?

To have a concept of distance, Felsted and Fooling go for about 14 miles regarding both, when you find yourself Shalford is roughly 6 miles north and you may some east regarding Felsted.

Not Our very own COLONIAL Kid…

The John Porter should not be mistaken for other John Porter just who found its way to Brand new The united kingdomt for the 1633. You to John Porter was a good signer of the Portsmouth Lightweight inside the what turned the newest Colony of Rhode Isle, lived in Boston and you can try among modern purchasers away from the newest Pettaquamscutt lands (later Southern area Kingstown, Rhode Island). He noticed debate and you can judge to own deserting their spouse later inside existence and taking up with the previous common-legislation girlfriend off an upstanding member of the community. This is not our man. But, the latest Geni webpage to own partner deserter John (aka John Porter from Narragansett) says that he’s a sister to our John – a few cousin Johns on the family members? Hmmm. We have gotta state, I am not confident. I may check out which later, although not today.

Neither should the John become confused with the number of John Porter’s who appeared in Virginia of the 1642, however they are most likely relevant, because there is actually solid proof they certainly were descended of Edmund Porter away from Tapenhall. Which loved ones range also happens to allege one or two sis Johns in a comparable family relations. Is actually this family unit members incapable of convinced upwards people names? hahah.

Another John Porter not to be confused with ours are Edinburgh beach hookup John Porter Sr., an effective , MA following moving to Salem, in which he was new patriarch of the wealthiest friends in the town. So it John Porter is found on a listing of Individuals of the fresh Salem Witch Trials in sandwich group “maybe not indicted”.

John Porter-Anna Light Relationships

John Porter and you may Anna White was in fact married 18 Oct 1620 at All of the Saints Church in Messing, Essex, The united kingdomt according to Fooling Parish facts.

Note: I’ve seen one background one to incorporated an initial spouse for John, saying the guy hitched a Margaret Odding inside the 1606 in the Madron, Cornwall, The united kingdomt, where she passed away when you look at the 1671. However, the John could have merely started twelve at the time of it wedding; A fast browse shows that Margaret Odding hitched you to definitely other John Porter (in the above list) – I understand, I understand – one to John might have merely become in the a year old built to your times given – but he’s not my John, therefore i are not searching toward it, however, if they are your, then chances are you would be to!