Controlling for spatial preferences, the mixture model retrieved a total of 972 significant social clustering events (Y1 = 209; Y2 = 227; Y3 = 277; Y4 = 259). Calculating a weighted assortativity coefficient for each annual network revealed significant social assortment by spatial community membership ( r d w : Y1 = 0.204; Y2 = 0.129; Y3 = 0.176; Y4 = 0.130) when tested against a null model of 10 000 random networks (figure 1c). 074 (0.065), Y2: 0.129 (0.015), Y3: 0.177 (0.025), Y4: ?0.043 (0.042)). Mantel tests revealed that there was a strong correlation in the dyadic association strength between pairs for years 12 (n = 29, Mantel r = 0.74, CI = 0.13–0.30, p < 0.001), 23 (n = 35, Mantel r = 0.85, CI = 0.13–0.29, p < 0.001), 34 (n = 31, Mantel r = 0.78, CI = 0.13–0.27, p < 0.001) and finally for the duration of the study for years 14 (n = 22, Mantel r = 0.76, CI = 0.16–0.35, p < 0.001).
(b) Alterations in classification proportions
The number of tagged sharks increased throughout the morning, for both communities (blue and red), peaking about (GLMM R 2 = 0.18, 0.10; F = 244.9, 111.9, p < 0.001, community 2, community 4, respectively; figure 2a). The number of tagged sharks detected then decreased, reaching a minimum by – before starting to increase at – (figure 2a). Footage from camera tags deployed on two sharks showed that group size typically varied between two and 14 individuals, with group size increasing throughout the morning and peaking in the afternoon (figure 2c, electronic supplementary material, video S4). Close following behaviour, where individuals were approximately less than 1 m from a conspecific, was commonly observed (electronic supplementary material, S4). It is likely that detection range of receivers will be reduced at night due to increased noise on the reef, which may influence our ability to detect individuals. However, the more gradual increase in shark numbers throughout the early morning as well camera footage still suggests diel changes in group size are genuine.
Shape 2. Diel several months forecasts changes in group dimensions from inside the a few prominent organizations. (a) Number of acoustically tagged sharks imagined during the core receivers boost significantly for hours for people in the a couple of premier organizations (red and you can bluish, figure 1). (b) Figure bring regarding a pet-borne cam off a gray reef shark getting into intimate pursuing the conduct. (c,d) Camera tag derived lowest class proportions transform for hours for several females gray reef sharks contained in this neighborhood dos. (On line type inside the the color.)
(c) Individual-built models
Our earliest IBMs indicated that somebody only using personal information in order to to get tips (loners) has much lower fitness than those playing with societal and private suggestions (digital supplementary situation, S5). Around most of the simulated conditions of starting percentages off prey top quality (effective reward) and you can patch occurrence, 
the ratio from ‘loner’ someone easily refuted generally speaking to extinction, unless energetic benefits was in fact quite high (electronic secondary issue, S5). Our very own next series of habits (individual and you will social info/some CPFs, someone else wanderers) showed that no matter prey quality, spot density or the performing proportion of wanderers so you can CPFs, in most model problems CPFs got much deeper survival minutes (shape step 3, electronic second situation, S3 and you can S5). When simulations had been focus on with reduced predictable spatial stability out of victim spots, CPFs usually had prolonged emergency times than simply drifting foragers despite plot density otherwise top quality (profile 3c–f). not, the real difference during the survival big date are finest in the highest patch densities and quality (shape 3, electronic secondary question, S3 and S5).
댓글을 남겨주세요