From the outcome of this study, some pointers can be made for further techniques linked to conflict quality. From inside the relevant books, generally social experience training (Openshaw, Mills, Adams, Durso, 1992), communications and you will troubleshooting degree (Clarke Greenberg, 1986; DeForest Hugles, 1992; Enough time Adams, 2001) and you can caribbean cupid behavioural approach (Robin, Patrica, Moye, 1995; Energy, 1992) were chosen for training out of argument quality. Although not, cognitive behavioural treatment were great at ent from dispute solution skills (Hoyer, Fecht, Louterback Schneider, 2001; Spillane-Grieco, 2000). So it attempts contributes that people can acquire way more satisfaction off their relationships.
You will find some constraints and this dictate generalization of them performance. Earliest, the analysis are limited level of new member and you will decide to try is employed off university students. For this reason, new samplecan not be portray all the adolescent. Next, parents-teenagers connections is actually checked by using self-declaration tips and anly regarding adolescents’ angle. This steps will offer limited information regarding connections. 3rd, individuals’ impression about family was checked-out certain time of telecommunications, maybe not over the months.
Coming degree could be imitate the current studies in addition to sample of people of certain years and you may area. Morever, mothers kids connections can be examined using different methods including videotaped otherwise direct observation. Observational education you may bring additional information regarding especially family relations and you may parents’ effect on the relation is deemed during the then degree. This research will be regular in some durations when you look at the a beneficial longitudinal analysis which could give much more practical efficiency.
Addis, J. Bernard, Meters. Age. (2002). Relationship adjustment and you may irrational thinking. Log off Rational emotive and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, 20, 3-13.
Akbalik, G. (2001). Catiflma cozme olce inin gecerlik ve guvenirlik calismas>. (the analysis from legitimacy out-of reliability out of Dispute Resolution Size). Turk Psikolojik Dan>flma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 16,7-13
Clark, K. Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Differential effects of gestalt one or two-settee intervention and you may troubleshooting in fixing desicional argument. Diary away from Counseling Psychology, 33,11-15.
Next mental intervention considering intellectual behavior principle could well be applied to people to be awareness of its which have impaired relationships philosophy and its particular unwanted effects on their conflict quality process and alter its impaired viewpoints
Cramer, D. (2004). Effectation of the latest malicious values disgareement beliefs to the matchmaking satisfaction that have aromantic partner otherwise companion. Mindset and you will Psychotherapy, 77, 121-133.
Debord, J., Romans, S. C., Krieshok, T. (1996). Predictions dyadic variations away from standard and you can dating certain viewpoints. Record away from Therapy, 130, 263-280.
DeForest, P. Hughes, J.(1992). Therapy of moms and dad-adolescent disagreement as a result of behavioral techonology studies: case study. Record from Instructional Mental Session, 3,281-301.
DiGuiseppe, Roentgen. Zee, C. (1986). A mental emotive idea off relationship breakdown and relationship cures. Journal off Rational emotive and you may Intellectual Behavioural Treatment, 4, 22-37.
Unrealistic viewpoints away from scientific people: Its relationship to requirement, requires and you can fulfillment
Eidelson, Roentgen. J. Epstein, N. (1982). Knowledge and you will relationships maladjustment: Growth of a way of measuring dysfunctional matchmaking values. Journal from Asking and you can Scientific Mindset, fifty, 715-720.
Emmelkamp, P. Grams., Krol, B., Sanderman, Roentgen., Ruphan, Meters. (1987). The fresh review off matchmaking viewpoints during the relationship perspective. Personality and you may Private Differences, 8, 775-780.
Epstein, N., Baucom., D. H., Rankin, L. Good. (1993). Treatments for relationship dispute: a cognitive behavioural method. Scientific Psychology Comment, 13, 45-57.
Epstein, N., Finnegan, B. Bythell, D. (1979). Unreasonable philosophy and you can perception out-of relationship disagreement. Journal out-of Consulting and you may Systematic Therapy, 47, 608-610.
Epstein, N., Pretzer, J. L. Fleming, B. (1987). The brand new character out-of intellectual appraisal during the care about-accounts from relationship interaction. Decisions Treatment, 18, 51-69.
Eryuksel, A good. (1996). Anne baba ve ergen iliflkilerinin condition cozme iletiflim becerileri biliflsel carptmalar ve aile yaps acsndan incelenmesi.(The analysis out of household members relation regarding troubleshooting, telecommunications enjoy, intellectual distortion and you may family relations construction). Yaynlanmamls Doktora Tezi. (Unpublished master thesis) Ege Univeristesi.
댓글을 남겨주세요