Participants felt the excuse-giver was less trustworthy when they provided a day (vs. money) excuse (Mtime = 4.23, SD = 1.53; Mmoney = 5.35, SD = 1.24), F(1, 449) = , p < .001, ? 2 = .15. Participants also felt the excuse-giver was less trustworthy when they provided an excuse in response to consumption in the distant (vs. close) future (Mnear = 5.06, SD = 1.34; Mdistant_future = 4.51, SD = 1.60), F(1, 449) = , p < .001, ? 2 = .05. These main effects were qualified by a significant interaction, F(1, 449) = 3.68, p = .05, ? 2 = .01. Planned comparisons showed that when a money excuse was provided in response to an invitation for near and future consumption, there was a significant difference in perceived trustworthiness (Mnear = 5.54, SD = 1.10; Mdistant_coming = 5.19, SD = 1.33); F(1, 449) = 3.78, p = .05, ? 2 = .01. However, a time excuse was perceived as much less trustworthy in response to an invitation for future (vs. near) consumption (Mnear = 4.63, SD = 1.40; Mdistant_coming = 3.79, SD = 1.56); F(1, 449) = , p < .001, ? 2 = .05.
Moderated mediation
We checked to have moderated serial mediation pursuing the Techniques (Hayes, 2015 ) design 85. Inside model, we examined whether the effectation of excuse form of to the thinking from social closeness are serially mediated by the thinking regarding controllability of your own capital additionally the after that standing of this new reason. I including checked whether that it serial mediation impression try moderated of the if the usage is actually occurring from the close otherwise faraway future. The general design is actually significant (? = .09, 95% CI: .01 so you’re able to .19), and therefore recommended moderated serial mediation. Significantly more specifically, the outcomes of one’s data revealed that, once the serial mediation outcomes was basically extreme for both close and you will distant-coming usage, the new indirect consequences had been more powerful for faraway future (? = .23, 95% CI: .thirteen so you can .36) compared to close-upcoming usage (? = .14, 95% CI: .07 to .23). Find Table S6.
Conversation
Analysis 3B given then evidence that best hookup apps Shreveport folks become smaller alongside a love companion after getting a period (against. money) reason. We replicated our top impact the period (versus. money) reasons was in fact named much more manageable much less trustworthy, causing reduced closeness. These effects had been most obvious when a period justification is actually considering to have usage regarding faraway (vs. near) upcoming, and you may have been told me because of the discrepant attitudes regarding financing slack to own time in the place of profit the latest distant and near future.
Inside our earlier studies, we located facts you to definitely customers perceive communication time shortage so you’re able to become smaller dependable than simply correspondence from the currency shortage. It impact try inspired from the perceptions the period is a resource you to definitely customers do have more private power over, causing down attitude from interpersonal connection. Within our past training, we examined consumer impressions away from correspondence away from welcomes to have common user knowledge. Within study, we discuss whether or not these outcomes persevere whenever providing a good rationale to have non-mutual individual feel, which is, providing to charity explanations. Individuals are frequently met with the brand new consult to provide each other money and you can time and energy to charity factors, and regularly promote a beneficial rationale as to the reasons they can’t would this behavior (Exley, 2016 ). Examining the charity providing context as well as lets us circulate beyond evaluating exactly how shortage correspondence has an effect on notice-advertised impressions regarding relationship intimacy and consider a behavioral way of measuring prosociality into the justification-givers. When anyone is actually thinking, it show higher prosocial conclusion into the its couples (Reis et al., 2010 ), hence, i forecast one to receivers from a funds (versus. time) reason will be likely to operate prosocially towards the brand new justification-giver. Contained in this studies, i also expand all of our exploration to evaluate how those who share capital lack perceive their correspondence. Therefore, we are able to try if an asymmetry can be acquired inside attitudes off controllability, trustworthiness, and interpersonal consequences.
댓글을 남겨주세요