To help you contrast our very own 2nd hypothesis, we earliest recoded, for every of the things that with the status level, new percentage of responses you to reveal when the husbands reduce, equivalent or even more results, namely, updates, having hypogamy, and therefore husbands have straight down status than simply wives, homogamy, definition equal position, and hypergamy, definition husbands with high position than simply wives. Towards potential organization out-of country, analyses was significant for the studies (X 2 =11.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you can financial impression regarding a possible splitting up (X 2 =nine.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Analysis showed that, to have Spanish players, there’s sitios de citas mexicanas mexico a great deal more knowledge hypogamy, while getting Dominican participants there was a lot more training homogamy. In regards to the monetary situations in case of divorce, while there is more homogamy getting Foreign language professionals, there can be alot more hypergamy having Dominicans (select Shape step 1).
That have prior marriages or otherwise not was not relevant to differences in reputation. About the prospective connection ranging from reputation and you may many years married, significant relationships was indeed used in health (X dos =fourteen.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), and even though to possess lovers y exists (forty.4%, each), getting partners y is available (43.4%). Quite simply, to your group with additional ages married, husbands possess lower health reputation. That have youngsters away from previous marriages and having pupils of current wedding failed to significantly apply to status.
In the share, the analyses concerning second hypothesis showed that as opposed to all of our requirement, the biggest feature associated in order to updates is the nation.
Univariate assessment revealed extreme differences in factor step one (F=5
To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).
Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.
In the end, hypogamy situations when you look at the Spain obtained somewhat less than hypogamy affairs in Dominican Republic
Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.
Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).
댓글을 남겨주세요