Most of the educators throughout the analysis have been authoritative Enneagram instructors throughout the Story Culture. The brand new Enneagram Circuit training Programs utilized five pri sorts of boards, (2) didactic understanding, (3) meditation teaching, and you can (4) experiential exploration. Enneagram Rigorous Trainings coaches used a plan entitled The brand new Enneagram Intensive®: Partnering Emotional Life and Spirit.
The three Introductory classes provided pri studying modalities. The newest Berkeley path incorporated informal Enneagram types of panels and didactic reading. Brand new Minnesota path made use of all four of your primary reading strategies. New Palo Alto course put Enneagram variety of panels, didactic discovering, and experiential exploration http://www.datingranking.net/fastflirting-review such as directed visualization.
Studies Study
Forms was had written by a research secretary and delivered to good Cook-Greuter-authoritative SCT scorer (Hy and you will Loevinger 1996) through article send. Password number were utilized therefore, the rater was blind to the type of your own sample, the new schedules of the test, while the knowledge class sorts of. The scorer adopted the training by the Susan Create-Greuter, utilising the amazing Loevinger tips guide, with the exception of stems not in the tips guide (Cook-Greuter 1999). Scored responses was repaid for the scientists during the a get noticed bequeath sheet that has been then useful for investigation data. To be sure accuracy of one’s rating to possess contributes to and that members ran upwards or down a couple of degrees, an example of these studies has also been obtained from the Prepare-Greuter by herself.
Efficiency
An analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed that there were no pre-existing ego development differences at baseline among the participants between the sites, F(8, 9) = 0.38, p = .93. The pretest and posttest ego development scores were significantly correlated (r = .48, p < .001), whereby participants with higher pre-training scores also had higher post-training scores.
Because there are a lot more older than more youthful adults within attempt, an analysis is conducted to test the connection ranging from age bracket and you will training impact. In total, forty users (33%, letter = ) enhanced no less than one values pursuing the training. Proportionally, way more 50–59 seasons olds (45%, letter = ) versus almost every other a long time enhanced one or more stages immediately after the education (20%, n = 1/5, lower than 30; 0%, letter = 0/step 3, 30–39 seasons olds; 25%, n = 7/twenty-eight, 40–forty two 12 months olds; and you may 24%, letter = 8/33, 60+ 12 months olds). To look at if it pattern was statistically high, an effective ? 2 sample out-of freedom is computed from the contrasting years group and you can if a person educated pride phase continuing growth of one to or maybe more level after the intervention (or not).
A diagnosis was also used to check the relationship between participant gender and studies feeling. Whether or not proportionally, alot more female (36%, letter = ) than men (18%, n = 4/22) advanced a minumum of one values after the training, a ? dos take to out of liberty revealed zero dating between intercourse and you will pride invention.
Two repeated-measures ANOVAs were conducted to test for within-subject ego development changes across the training sites. The first model examined the interaction term of ego development by training site type as a dichotomous variable (intensive site vs. introductory site); the model was not significant at the p < .05 level, F(1,120) = 1.32, p = .25. The second model examined the interaction term of ego development by individual training site; the model was also not significant at the p < .05 level, F(7, 114) = 1.40, p = .21.
Paired sample t tests were conducted to examine whether there were significant changes in ego development scores before compared to after the Enneagram training interventions at each site. Data revealed that the Asheville 2005 participant group showed a significant increase in ego development scores following the intervention, t(22) = ? 3.36, p < .01. Table 4 sument scores and the paired t test results.
댓글을 남겨주세요